Topological monodromy as an obstruction to Hamiltonization of nonholonomic systems: pro or contra?

The phenomenon of a topological monodromy in integrable Hamiltonian and nonholonomic systems is discussed. An efficient method for computing and visualizing the monodromy is developed. The comparative analysis of the topological monodromy is given for the rolling ellipsoid of revolution problem in two cases, namely, on a smooth and on a rough plane. The first of these systems is Hamiltonian, the second is nonholonomic. We show that, from the viewpoint of monodromy, there is no difference between the two systems, and thus disprove the conjecture by Cushman and Duistermaat stating that the topological monodromy gives a topological obstruction for Hamiltonization of the rolling ellipsoid of revolution on a rough plane.Comment: 31 pages, 11 figure

Hyperchaotic attractors of three-dimensional maps and scenarios of their appearance

We study bifurcation mechanisms of the appearance of hyperchaotic attractors in three-dimensional maps. We consider, in some sense, the simplest cases when such attractors are homoclinic, i.e. they contain only one saddle fixed point and entirely its unstable manifold. We assume that this manifold is two-dimensional, which gives, formally, a possibility to obtain two positive Lyapunov exponents for typical orbits on the attractor (hyperchaos). For realization of this possibility, we propose several bifurcation scenarios of the onset of homoclinic hyperchaos that include cascades of both supercritical period-doubling bifurcations with saddle periodic orbits and supercritical Neimark-Sacker bifurcations with stable periodic orbits, as well as various combinations of these cascades. In the paper, these scenarios are illustrated by an example of three-dimensional Mir\'a map.Comment: 40 pages, 24 figure

Topological monodromy as an obstruction to Hamiltonization of nonholonomic systems: pro or contra?

The phenomenon of a topological monodromy in integrable Hamiltonian and nonholonomic systems is discussed. An efficient method for computing and visualizing the monodromy is developed. The comparative analysis of the topological monodromy is given for the rolling ellipsoid of revolution problem in two cases, namely, on a smooth and on a rough plane. The first of these systems is Hamiltonian, the second is nonholonomic. We show that, from the viewpoint of monodromy, there is no difference between the two systems, and thus disprove the conjecture by Cushman and Duistermaat stating that the topological monodromy gives a topological obstruction for Hamiltonization of the rolling ellipsoid of revolution on a rough plane

Topological monodromy as an obstruction to Hamiltonization of nonholonomic systems: pro or contra?

The phenomenon of a topological monodromy in integrable Hamiltonian and nonholonomic systems is discussed. An efficient method for computing and visualizing the monodromy is developed. The comparative analysis of the topological monodromy is given for the rolling ellipsoid of revolution problem in two cases, namely, on a smooth and on a rough plane. The first of these systems is Hamiltonian, the second is nonholonomic. We show that, from the viewpoint of monodromy, there is no difference between the two systems, and thus disprove the conjecture by Cushman and Duistermaat stating that the topological monodromy gives a topological obstruction for Hamiltonization of the rolling ellipsoid of revolution on a rough plane